Jump to content

Scarlet

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    254

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by Scarlet

  2. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Matt said:

    It's a Necropost if nobody has interacted with the post in an extended period of time. In this case it was posted on September 9th with the last post being on the 18th (Mine) and now the most recent being today the 14th of October giving a period 28 days in between posts. By definition it constitutes a Necropost regardless of any "activity" which I don't even know what that could be given the user who posted this hasn't been online since the 3rd of October. @ScharlakenRose

    if it's such an issue to post on an older topic, how about we just simply ask @Mordred, or any other staff member to lock the older threads?

     

  3. Posted

    Ground Rules: Mark Spoiler Content as such. Do not start an argument over small details.

    With the first Episode of the newest Season released today, there's alot to cover. From the Trailers we've found the Main Group from Volume 4 in Haven. Unfortunately for them, not all seems to be as well as they thought.

    SO here we are to discuss what we foresee for the rest of this season!

    Again, please keep it civil.

  4. Posted

    1 hour ago, Matt said:

    Right, but even still. IC Rumor or not, my point still stands, if you want to garner attention it still helps to put some attention to detail. It's more or less a helpful tip, and if you bothered to read it, the person listed it as an interest check hence why I criticized it as such. Also is it really necessary to Necropost? This topic is very clearly dead as the original poster hasn't even added to it nor posted since September 9th. @ScharlakenRose

    See, when something pops up in thread activity, I don't expect it to be this old. Probably means someone edited something or a post got liked. I don't really consider it a necro when I'm seeing activity shown on the front page of the forums.

  5. Posted

    1 minute ago, Deramyr said:

    Back before it was out, somebody I was studying with showed me one of the trailers. The show isn't quite as funny now as what got me hooked, but I enjoy it for everything else now too so.

    the animation is so much more dynamic than what we started with too. With quality improving, I can forgive some of the comedic value having been left when Monty Oum passed

  8. Posted

    8 minutes ago, Deramyr said:

    Comes out soon, I am keen.

    To be honest I'm not sure I want to expect anything. Thus far, I've been pleasantly (and shockingly) surprised by where the story has gone.

    It's the 14th here already, not long now...

    Oh hey I didn't expect you to be a fan ;)
    I'll be making discussion threads for each episode. Hope to see you around with them ^^

  10. Posted

    On 9/18/2017 at 1:03 PM, Matt said:

    If i'm honest with you, I would put more time into your post before you do an interest check, You really have not provided any information regarding what your guild is or going to do aside from your brief line. Just looking at the post doesn't really make me want to involve myself with it as it has no information regarding the guild itself. 

    If you want to get attention for your group which in my opinion seems pretty neato burrito, I would highly suggest that you include some information regarding the guild itself, Backstory,Structure, current members (If any), that sorta thing. If I may also offer you some constructive criticism, I think the idea of a Dark Magic wielding Assassin order is a bit well overdone, depending on the type of magics that you plan on implementing into your group which i'm assuming is Shadow or void, I would have to say that there are copious amounts of logistical problems that go with that, predominantly being the magics induce insanity with continued use, this is more so with void but shadow has a similar effect. Perhaps eliminating that aspect of your guild might be a better idea, Most subtlety rogues typically use shadow in their abilities anyways. 

     

     

    It's more of an IC rumor, as is what this sub-forum is intended for. I'd imagine if you want more ooc info one could just PM the poster?

  14. Posted

    Some neutral colored rooftops would be nice. I don't imagine every human building ever actually has blue shingles, it's just moreso an alliance color-coding thing that started in the RTS games to identify units kek

  16. Posted

    21 minutes ago, Biggrouse said:

    >paid microtransactions in a single-player full priced game

    ?????????? good shit go౦ԁ sHit? thats ✔ some good??shit right??there??? right✔there ✔✔if i do ƽaү so my self ? i say so ? thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMᎷМ? ?? ?НO0ОଠOOOOOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??Good shit

    p sure games like assassin's creed and Watch dogs also have micro transactions. As do many other single-player games. Unfortunately it's more common than ever now

  17. Posted

    28 minutes ago, Witch said:

     

    Yes. We have no issue as long as it is not done in public. The potential to impersonate the staff is too great, otherwise we do not mind if you use it for private role-plays and such.

    I do have to ask how it's possible to impersonate staff though, unless you can force the GM tag? If I recall the only text channel that has a specific color change for GMs is a whisper, and that's blue. I'm pretty sure the script I use does not effect whisper, despite me thinking it did before.

  19. Posted

    1 hour ago, Witch said:

    Hi everybody,

    We've updated the context of the rule to provide better clarification:

    Chat Modification: Changing the colours of messages you send to public mediums is not allowed. Addons which only modify the messages on your client are allowed, however those which may affect other players with the same addon are frowned upon.

    The reason this rule exists is because in the past these add-ons have been used to impersonate the administration. We will not stop you from using add-ons in your phase to enhance your experience, but we remain committed to enforcing the rule in public mediums such as the announce channels and the start zone. I hope this has helped to clear some of the air.

    So we are permitted to use scripts and addons which do this in private phases without worry?

  21. Posted

    13 minutes ago, MindScape said:

    I can agree with allowing it in private phases and such - just not on Global announce I suppose.

    The script I'm referring to doesn't apply at all to system channels, only basic chat channels. it also includes a filter for "." and "/" commands so that it doesn't prevent them from being used. P sure it was one Xeslite posted months ago on some other forums

  22. Posted

    Mac OS X Sierra has an ongoing problem, resulting directly from Apple locking down the applications allowed to run even further. Due to the edits on the Mac client, OSX mistakes it as a virus. There's a fairly easy way to fix the error, which involves reinstating the ability to run Unknown apps from "Anywhere" in OSX's Gatekeeper.

    Follow these easy instructions.

    1. Open your Terminal
    2. Enter this command: sudo spctl --master-disable
    3. Enter your Administrator password when prompted and press enter on your keyboard.
    4. Assuming you did that correctly, Open System Preferences and then open "Security and Privacy Settings"
    5. You should now have an option to allow apps downloaded from "Anywhere". Enable this and run the client from your Applications folder, or any subfolder within that directory.

      With this: The error should stop showing and the client should launch. Note this only seems to be needed for Mac OS X Sierra.

  25. Posted

    Rule in Question: " Chat Modification: Changing the colours of messages you send to the global broadcast is not allowed. Addons which only modify the messages on your client are allowed, however those which may affect other players with the same addon are frowned upon. "

    Why: Fairly recently I asked what this rule covers, as it's written only to specify "Global Broadcast", Which one would assume to mean the Announce, GUILD, and EVENT channels. It also specifies the use of an addon, which would send an addon message to another user of the same addon (mind you if they have an addon to have chat colors changed based on people using it, this should probably be considered more of a client side thing that can be fixed by uninstalling an addon)

    According to Tia, the rule also covers (without explicitly stating it, and if it's intended to, it isn't clear) public channels such as Say, yell, and emote. Assuming Party, Raid, and Whisper is included.
    The Rule apparently also covers any Scripts that can be run via Macro that can change messages of chat color only in non-system channels (say and yell).

    Suggestion: Since this doesn't particularly seem like something that can be massively exploited, I'd like to suggest an alternative to this rule. I tend to use a script to change the chat color when I DM events, to add a bit of flavor to things and to add further indication of who an emote is directed to.

    Perhaps the use of scripts to change chat color in public chat channels (not announce or any other system channel) while in phases (not including mainphase) would be something useful to add flavor to emotes and dialogue text. The worst that could truly happen is someone getting upset that they can't figure out how to do it. This could be easily remdied by releasing the script publicly and explaining how to use it.

    Alternatively: If such a simple thing is to remain disallowed, please ensure the rule regarding it is written clearly so that there are no misunderstandings about what it does and does not cover.

     

    Hope you all have a wonderful evening!

×